One of most amazing things about nearly all of Europe is their vast railroad infrastructure.  I took a high speed train from Frankfurt to Seigburg, Germany, topping out at a breathtaking 300 km/hr, or about 180 miles per hour.

To top it all off, their rail infrastructure is almost completely electric.  No diesel is sacrificed as it is here in the United States.

So why can’t we do that?

In the Midwest, there are light rail proposals being thrown around annually, gaining marginal traction with taxpayers. The problem typically revolves around ‘who ends up paying how much for what’.  And I can see the point.

I surely don’t want to pay for a local rail system I don’t use and can’t foresee any return on.

In my opinion, we need a national high speed rail system implemented from coast to coast, boarder to boarder.  Unfortunately the government would have to get involved to help define the standards (you don’t want one system on one gauge of track and another on a different gauge).  Ideally though, the infrastructure would be privately developed with government subsidies.

Think about it, going from New York to Chicago, or Chicago to Dallas via Kansas City or St. Louis.  Make that a day trip!

I believe that once such a system is defined, more local, light rail systems can take shape with much less risk to the bottom line.

If you live in a city with light rail, or even a country with high speed rail, do you see the system as an asset?

Technology, Travel high speed rail, transportation