Comments on: Bought RYPQX http://www.thecornerofficeblog.com/2008/06/10/bought-rypqx/ An entrepreneurs thoughts on business, personal finance and investing. Thu, 09 Jun 2011 19:02:59 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: The Corner Office Blog - An entrepreneurs thoughts on business, personal finance and investing. » Blog Archive » RYPQX: Let the suits begin http://www.thecornerofficeblog.com/2008/06/10/bought-rypqx/comment-page-1/#comment-39523 The Corner Office Blog - An entrepreneurs thoughts on business, personal finance and investing. » Blog Archive » RYPQX: Let the suits begin Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:44:02 +0000 http://www.thecornerofficeblog.com/?p=817#comment-39523 [...] I was able to unload all my RYPQX holdings a few weeks before the fund was frozen in light of the Bear Stearns [...] [...] I was able to unload all my RYPQX holdings a few weeks before the fund was frozen in light of the Bear Stearns [...]

]]> By: indexfundfan http://www.thecornerofficeblog.com/2008/06/10/bought-rypqx/comment-page-1/#comment-32439 indexfundfan Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:20:18 +0000 http://www.thecornerofficeblog.com/?p=817#comment-32439 Grant, the yield sure looks very attractive. I too am quite tempted to put money into it. However, what I am not so sure about is whether RYPQX would 'break the buck'. I know that historically, a money market fund has not broken the buck before (the fund management company would bail out the fund). But this fund is not a MMF and I think it stands a greater chance of breaking the buck. What are your views on this 'break-the-buck' risk on this fund? Grant, the yield sure looks very attractive. I too am quite tempted to put money into it. However, what I am not so sure about is whether RYPQX would ‘break the buck’. I know that historically, a money market fund has not broken the buck before (the fund management company would bail out the fund). But this fund is not a MMF and I think it stands a greater chance of breaking the buck.

What are your views on this ‘break-the-buck’ risk on this fund?

]]>