A third option for President?
April 30th, 2008 by Grant in: PoliticsI was sitting in a hotel room watching an interview with Jesse Ventura (you know, the pro wrestler turned governor of Minnesota) recently, and of course the subject was the presidential election.
He made a comment that really intrigued me: Have the two presidential candidates on the ballot, but a third option for “none of the above”.
Essentially, that would represent the folks who are taking the time to do their duty to vote, but don’t have enough confidence in any of the candidates to vote for either of them. I kind of like that.
To be honest, I don’t see anyone in the running I’m convinced would make a good leader of our country. Sure, I’d be OK if either Obama or McCain won, but I just can’t see voting for either of them.
So long as it’s not Hillary. I can’t stand to listen to her talk, and I cringe at the thought of having to sit through a State of the Union address listening to her shrill voice…
None of the above? Bad idea?
Tags: Politics
Leave comments below.
Subscribe to Comments
Loading ...
