<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Emigrant Direct rate drops to 4.55%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecornerofficeblog.com/2008/01/11/emigrant-direct-rate-drops-to-455/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecornerofficeblog.com/2008/01/11/emigrant-direct-rate-drops-to-455/</link>
	<description>An entrepreneurs thoughts on business, personal finance and investing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 19:02:59 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://www.thecornerofficeblog.com/2008/01/11/emigrant-direct-rate-drops-to-455/comment-page-1/#comment-24597</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecornerofficeblog.com/2008/01/11/emigrant-direct-rate-drops-to-455/#comment-24597</guid>
		<description>What are your thoughts on tax-exempt MM funds?  I have one at Vanguard and have been very pleased.  For those in high tax brackets, from what I can tell, they regularly outperform the highest netting savings accounts - in 2007 it returned 3.58%.

I don&#039;t know if they are available for every state, and granted I live in NY so my tax rates are higher.  But I generally pay about 36% total in tax, making that 3.58% worth nearly 5.6% in a taxable account.  Now it&#039;s down to 3.02%, still significantly higher (for me) than the Emigrant rate.

Is there any flaw in my logic?  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are your thoughts on tax-exempt MM funds?  I have one at Vanguard and have been very pleased.  For those in high tax brackets, from what I can tell, they regularly outperform the highest netting savings accounts &#8211; in 2007 it returned 3.58%.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if they are available for every state, and granted I live in NY so my tax rates are higher.  But I generally pay about 36% total in tax, making that 3.58% worth nearly 5.6% in a taxable account.  Now it&#8217;s down to 3.02%, still significantly higher (for me) than the Emigrant rate.</p>
<p>Is there any flaw in my logic?  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

