<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Additional OPEC Cuts in the Works?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecornerofficeblog.com/2006/11/05/additional-opec-cuts-in-the-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecornerofficeblog.com/2006/11/05/additional-opec-cuts-in-the-works/</link>
	<description>An entrepreneurs thoughts on business, personal finance and investing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 19:02:59 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Schasto</title>
		<link>http://www.thecornerofficeblog.com/2006/11/05/additional-opec-cuts-in-the-works/comment-page-1/#comment-1406</link>
		<dc:creator>Schasto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecornerofficeblog.com/2006/11/05/additional-opec-cuts-in-the-works/#comment-1406</guid>
		<description>I agree, too, David.  Need to keep the black gold high to drive down consumption.  Isn&#039;t this the fundamental theory of supply and demand?

I also agree with Grant driving down demand is what motivates OPEC to cut production.  I think they want to keep the prices high out of greed.

Either way we win because it forces us to continue developments of alternative energy, and I can see us being forced into pushing these developments through to the market as long as gas prices contiune to keep us away from the pump.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, too, David.  Need to keep the black gold high to drive down consumption.  Isn&#8217;t this the fundamental theory of supply and demand?</p>
<p>I also agree with Grant driving down demand is what motivates OPEC to cut production.  I think they want to keep the prices high out of greed.</p>
<p>Either way we win because it forces us to continue developments of alternative energy, and I can see us being forced into pushing these developments through to the market as long as gas prices contiune to keep us away from the pump.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.thecornerofficeblog.com/2006/11/05/additional-opec-cuts-in-the-works/comment-page-1/#comment-1277</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 16:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecornerofficeblog.com/2006/11/05/additional-opec-cuts-in-the-works/#comment-1277</guid>
		<description>Grant-

Glad you agree on the need to keep oil prices up.  As I wrote last week:

http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/2006/11/02/opec/

I now support all the efforts of OPEC to limit production or raise prices.  Americans now perceive dependence or foreign oil as the number one issue in the area of National Defense.  This is a good thing as it adds to the economic incentives to find alternative sources of energy and to find and utilize conservation technologies.

Good post.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grant-</p>
<p>Glad you agree on the need to keep oil prices up.  As I wrote last week:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/2006/11/02/opec/" rel="nofollow">http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/2006/11/02/opec/</a></p>
<p>I now support all the efforts of OPEC to limit production or raise prices.  Americans now perceive dependence or foreign oil as the number one issue in the area of National Defense.  This is a good thing as it adds to the economic incentives to find alternative sources of energy and to find and utilize conservation technologies.</p>
<p>Good post.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

